Increasing Automation in the Shipbuilding Production Process
Navy SBIR 2007.2 - Topic N07-133 NAVSEA - Ms. Janet Jaensch - [email protected] Opens: May 14, 2007 - Closes: June 13, 2007 N07-133 TITLE: Increasing Automation in the Shipbuilding Production Process TECHNOLOGY AREAS: Information Systems, Materials/Processes ACQUISITION PROGRAM: ACAT 1D, PMS 500 DDG 1000 OBJECTIVE: Develop innovative technologies that will increase the level of automation in common shipbuilding manufacturing processes. The focus of this topic is to reduce the complexity of the work and work content of the task. The solutions must be robust, user-friendly or autonomous, affordable and reasonably implementable in order to be substituted for current processes and be of significant value to the shipbuilding community. DESCRIPTION: The Navy's Program Executive Office for Ships is leveraging the National Research Program (NSRP) to effect change across the non-nuclear surface shipbuilding, modernization and repair enterprise by coordinating with U. S. shipbuilders to adapt and implement "World Class" commercial best manufacturing practices. This topic seeks innovative scientific and engineering solutions to inefficiencies in long-standing design and engineering methods. This topic offers an opportunity to infuse new ideas/innovations into the smaller, domestic shipbuilding industry. Of particular interest are initiatives with a clear business case. Proposals should specifically describe the technology that will be applied to solve the problem, how it will be developed, what the estimated benefits will be and how it might be transitioned into the shipbuilding industry. Proposals under this topic must address integration of the research areas identified. Efforts cited within each research area are illustrative only and proposals dealing with related efforts within each research area are also solicited. 1. Computerized methodologies to implement continuous process improvement techniques. Shipbuilding can benefits from this feedback, however are often limited by resources capable of collecting, analyzing and reporting available process data. Examples include, but are not limited to novel methodologies: Of particular interest are initiatives with a clear business case. Proposal should specifically describe the technology that will be applied to solve the problem, how it will be developed, what the specific benefit will be and how it might be transitioned into the shipbuilding industry. NSRP members are available to provide guidance and assistance in the identification of common issues and needs. Contact with these resources is encouraged both prior to proposal development and during any subsequent SBIR-related activity. Teaming with a NSRP member (or Government shipyard) is voluntary and will not be a factor in proposal selection. PHASE I: Demonstrate feasibility for improvements being developed and also identify impact upon shipbuilding affordability. Include a first order Return-On-Investment (ROI) analysis for industry implementation and estimate potential Total Ownership Cost (TOC) reduction. Establish Phase II performance goals and key developmental milestones. PHASE II: Finalize the design, as appropriate, and demonstrate a working prototype of the proposed system. Perform laboratory tests to validate the performance characteristics established in Phase I. Develop a detailed plan and method of implementation into a full-scale application. PHASE III: Implement the Phase III plan developed in Phase II in coordination with the shipbuilding and repair industry. REFERENCES: 1) NSRP ASE Strategic Investment Plan, available on line at http://www.nsrp.org KEYWORDS: automation; manufacturing; affordability; shipbuilding; TPOC: William Palko
|