Low Cost, Reliable Towed Sensors Handling Systems Navy SBIR FY2010.1 Sol No.: Navy SBIR FY2010.1 Topic No.: N101-043 Topic Title: Low Cost, Reliable Towed Sensors Handling Systems Proposal No.: N101-043-0846 Firm: 3 Phoenix, Inc. 14585 Avion Pwy Suite 200 Chantilly, Virginia 20151 Contact: John Jamieson Phone: (919) 562-5333 Web Site: www.3phoenix.com Abstract: The proposed Phase I investigation is expected to yield innovative technologies for development of a novel approach to array handling systems based on a totally different design for retrieving, deploying, storing and managing submarine towed array systems. The concept is based on the principles of a simple machine. This non-traditional system dramatically lowers the mechanical stresses on the towed array while providing great flexibility in control and drive systems. Additionally, this concept is very amenable to various installation locations on the submarine. 3 Phoenix has extensive experience with submarine towed arrays and handling systems, including damage assessment of telemetry electronics caused by current handling systems, and has been successful in transitioning leading edge technology to defense applications. We anticipate that the results of this effort will demonstrate the feasibility of the system approach and the path to implementation. Benefits: Results of the Phase I will provide the basis for viability and configuration of an innovative array handling system. The system, which boasts the lack of a slip-ring and much gentler handling of the array, can, by its nature, be configured to fit into almost any suitably sized space. This concept will be configured to meet the available space in a designated location preferred by the Navy during the investigation. The handling system configuration, material choices, drive architecture, and initial performance analysis will be determined within the scope of the Phase I. The Phase I effort, as a demonstration of feasibility, will provide a basis for a design of a scale model handling system upon which further analysis of longevity, loading, and reliability will be performed. More specific design details will be developed as pertains to the installation location and integration with the ship systems. The Phase II objective is to build a scale model of the design and generate a preliminary TEMPALT approach. Return